To celebrate Peelie's 40th Birthday in 1979, NME put him on the cover. They also printed a list of his 40 favorite tunes of all time, as played on his show the previous week. You can listen to John Peel's 40-at-40 faves here.
What struck me about this list is the extent to which Peel's erased the music of the late 60s and the first half of the '70s. All the stuff on which he'd built his reputation - as broadcasting custodian of Underground Rock - via his shows Perfumed Garden and Top Gear. The music on behalf of which he started his own record label, Dandelion.
Almost the entire list consists of
1/ early rock 'n' roll and blues
2/ punk and New Wave (three Undertones tunes in the Top 5! The godawful Quads)
3/ reggae and soul
Okay, okay, there are two songs from the Dandelion catalogue, by Mike Hart and Medicine Head. And he does have a bona fide "heads" classic from Captain Beefheart. There's a Faces tune and a Neil Young song.
Still only 5 out of 40 to represent the whole 1966-1976 era - that's a bit of personal history revisionism there.
Still, could have been worse - could have been Peel listing his 40 fave schoolgirls, eh?
Instructive to compare this All Time Faves list with where Peelie's head was at in Christmas 1975 when he looked back at the year's offerings. This is his Top 15, counting down to the #1 which is the Be Bop Deluxe tune
Peter Frampton - Show Me The Way (A and M)
Bob Marley and The Wailers - No Woman No Cry (Island)
Joan Armatrading - Dry Land (A and M)
John Lennon - Imagine (Apple)
Rod Stewart - Sailing (Warner Bros)
Roy Harper - When An Old Cricketer Leaves The Crease (Harvest)
Jack The Lad - Gentleman Soldier (Charisma)
Millie Jackson - Loving Arms (Polydor)
Be Bop Deluxe - Maid In Heaven (Harvest)
You can hear the countdown of tracks with Peel's comments here
Now you might think this is the absolute nadir of rock music and the kind of climate that necessitated punk and its historical revisions, but immediately after playing Lennon's "Imagine" (not even properly from '75, a rerelease!), Peel actually says: "despite what other people say, I think this has been a great year for records, 1975 - and I think from this point on, all of the singles that I've chosen would actually get into my all-time Top 50"
Unbelievably, the next one is
Well, he could have been correct in his prognosis about these glories getting into his all time Top 50, because the 1979 list is only a Top 40 - perhaps "Sailing", "When An Old Cricketer", "Gentleman Soldier", "Loving Arms" and "Made in Heaven" would have been tightly clustered in the 50 to 41 stretch. But I suspect not... I suspect they were all junked to make room for The Quads, Silicon Teens and SLF and more stuff like that.
He did apparently insist to his dying day that The Quads was one of his all-time favorite singles.
Here's his faves from the previous year, 1974
postscript 9/14/2023
Michaelangelo Matos directs me to the famous Peel show in December 1976 which inaugurates the big switcheroo
https://www.mixcloud.com/karleldridge5/john-peel-10th-december-1976-the-famous-punk-rock-special/
And also points me to David Cavanagh's book Good Night and Good Riddance, "his history of John Peel on the radio through over 200 programs", which has good stuff on the Old Wave / New Wave transformation - MM helpfully directs readers to specific pages, suggesting starting "at p. 126 (Nuggets), jump to 188 (Ramones), then go from there"
I have the book and have dipped in here and there, but never read the stuff on the cusp-of-punk
It's a great concept for a book.
In fact, it struck me as a template that any number of writers could do and you would end up with a largely different book each time. You could pick different shows than Cavanagh. Or you could pick some of the same shows he picked, but just focus on different records and artists. You could connect the shows to different things going on in the wider music culture / society / politics.
I even toyed with doing it as a blog series, and started gathering Peel shows. Not only did I not do the blog series, I have never listened to the Peel shows!
One frustrating thing - something that frustrated Cavanagh -is that the number of shows from the prepunk'70s that have survived through fan archiving is very spotty. For some reasons there's more from the late 60s, the Perfumed Garden, and early Top Gear - perhaps it was more of a big deal, or that was the only way to hear the music, so people got their reel-to-reel tape recorders out. But some particular years in the early-mid '70s, there's only a handful of shows. Perhaps because Peel-type music you could get more easily from records shops... and it was prior to the cassette recorder becoming an integral part of music centers and transistor radio sets.
Cavanagh, conscientious researcher that he was (RIP, BTW), actually journeyed out to some national library building on the periphery of London and went through the records of each show, in which Peel listed what had been played on forms, so that performing rights payments could be directed to the right parties. I believe a few of shows he writes about are ones where these documents are the only archival residue - he wasn't able to hear the show or Peel's patter between records.
The prepunk '70s would be the ones I'd be most interested to hear. Because I didn't live through that era as a music fan - and the Old Wave gestalt is so fascinating.
Whereas with postpunk, I was a regular and attentive Peel listener. Being of very limited funds, I'd taped tracks off it (although hardly ever sessions - back in the day I was never that excited by the whole Peel session thing. I'm now a little more interested, just because of things like the first Scritti session which contained tracks that would never be released or properly recorded. But back then, no... when he'd played a track from a session that was like an interruption in the flow of actual records as far as I was concerned.)
Since Cavanagh did the book, some more Peel shows from the first half of the '70s have subsequently emerged. Often mutilated portions of a show, or of poor sound quality.
But it's still very spotty.
But yeah I never did it.
The whole later part of DC's project would not be tempting at all... meaning the last 25 years or so of his broadcasting.
You see, my real-time impression of Peel's show is that they got less enjoyable, essential or even useful in the post-postpunk era.
New Pop he gave a wide berth to (except for his cherished Altered Images) because it was getting played by the day time deejays on Radio One, so that meant he'd be stuck with (or perhaps simply preferred) postpunk's runty afterbirth, Red Lorry Yellow Lorry, or actual punk records, from the Second Wave of Punk (I seem to remember a lot of Vice Squad). And there'd be roots reggae past its prime and the beginnings of his world-y interests.
From that era I seem to recall taping an early Triffids session, when they were Birthday Party / Doors influenced. But it was a slim pickings sort of time. .
Then as we get into the mid-Eighties, the Peel Show became an increasingly dreary listen... He did like the shambling bands, but which I mean the bogsheddy types, the rumbledythump bands as one fanzine tagged them, quite accurately.
My memory is that from 1986 onwards I rarely listened to Peel - partly because the show had got too eclectically disparate. But mainly - I just didn't need it anymore. As a music journo, I was getting sent so many of the new records, so I was able to be my own filter (Peel as filter seemed less and less reliable). And most evenings, I just wasn't in - I was out seeing bands, seeing people, enjoying the other things London had to offer.
As a journalist prone to excitation, I increasingly found Peel's gruff stolidity to be frustrating, deflating - the chronic understatement of the patter seemed to have this levelling effect.
So I think I might have listened to Peel once in the entire 1990s. And then it was because it was playing in a car I was in. I seem to remember him playing quite an exciting techno record, a real juggernaut of a track. But you wouldn't habitually turn to Peel for guidance on that kind of music, would you? Touching that he would continue to keep an interest (and later play his son's happy hardcore tunes), but yeah... there were other more reliable sources.
Another measure of how far Peel had rejected his previous self is how he refused to play Rapeman and PWEI's "Beaver Patrol".
ReplyDeleteI used to listen to Peel circa 1985-1986, when most of what he played was either grim parochial shite (Bogshed, A Witness, Slab!) or fey parochial shite (Close Lobsters, Brilliant Corners, 1000 Violins) and retrospectively formed an extreme dislike of him for all the crud he subjected me to just to hear the occasional decent track.
But in hindsight, I think this stuff was like an existential cold shower for him, to atone for his previous excesses.
That's when I stopped listening to Peel pretty much.- that 1985-86 period.
DeleteAnother issue was the stuff he played was just too eclectic by that point - a right dog's dinner of Afropop, throwback punk, shambling bands / cutie pop, reggae, all sorts. By that point I was getting sent enough records to be doing my own filtering and finding stuff.
This mirrors the ideological journey of Steve Albini himself, who is now fully militant, censoriously woke - Eminem too.
DeleteThe thing about Peel's eclecticism was that he had such an amazing ear for the worst music possible, such as Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle (the German Bogshed), the Frank Chickens (the Japanese Bogshed) or Anhrefn (the Welsh Bogshed).
DeleteHe was like somebody who collected reinforced concrete from around the world.
Albini's reinvention on Twitter as your gruff but soft-hearted liberal uncle is a hilarious pivot from his 80s persona as the nastiest sick kid of rock'n'roll.
DeleteThat said, it is nice to see someone's reputation being enhanced by their Twitter presence, for a change. It's much more common for people to destroy themselves.
I suspect that woke/anti-woke are two sides of the same coin, which makes flipping relatively easy, even if the ideological shift can seem disorientating to observers. Plenty of people have made the opposing shift, as almost every right-wing newspaper columnist is an ex-Trot. If what you value is moral certainty above all else, either position is tenable.
DeleteTrue. But there's a lot in his feed that's not even woke militancy. It's more a suburban Little League coach on Facebook / Tom Hanks kind of vibe:
Deletehttps://twitter.com/electricalWSOP/status/1699212645713223912?s=20
https://twitter.com/electricalWSOP/status/1698713977637736916?s=20
I love the thought of Steve Albini tapping his feet to the Proclaimers!
I don't think I have yet seen him posting video of his daffy golden retriever Kurt jumping out of his minivan and leaping into a pile of leaves in the front yard, but it must only be a matter of time.
I look forward to the 80 year-old Albini climbing into his attic, chancing upon his old cache of Korean snuff movies and saying to himself "Gee! I was kinda crazy in those ole' days".
DeleteHaha!
DeleteI think the idea with Albini is that he always had baseline liberal views - but that in the post-hardcore noise scene, any kind of right-on talk or sanctimony or positive type messages was considered wack and uncool - and there was that fascination with horrible, gross stuff and the extremes of human psychology. And a kind of fashionable baiting of liberal do-gooder types. Trolling and shit-rolling.
DeleteSo it's more that he's reverted to his fundamental values, or started to be open about them. Plus some mellowing with age.
Some of the people on that scene quite quickly left behind the 'serial killers are cool' thing (e.g S. Youth with "I believe Anita Hill" and "Youth Against Fascism" - i always thought their attempts at right-on sentiments didn't sit comfortably with their cooler-than-cool image). But some actually were unhealthily fascinated - and I think a fair few have drifted to the actual right.
Taking a kind of meta-view here, but I think this kind of cultural bifurcation, for example between woke and anti-woke, can only really happen in a first-past-the-post political system, where it's winner-takes-all. What's very striking about both the left and right in Britain is their pervasive, unquenchable sense that something is deeply wrong.
DeleteI think FPTP was also behind that exaggerated sense of decline that was so pervasive in Britain in the late 1970's - in a winner takes all system, both sides are highly motivated to exaggerate social and economic problems when the other side are in power. The overall effect though is a generalised demoralisation.
FPTP is really a terrible system, because in addition to its basic unfairness, it's corrosive to the common good.
It's the same system in America, made worse by the electoral college.
DeleteTo actually get legislation achieved requires a contrary move within Congress to compromise and negotiate. But if the goal of the party is just to win power, rather than implement policy, there's no incentive during elections to talk the bipartisanship talk.
In most of Europe, they have a different problem, proportional representation leads to a profusion of small parties and thus governing requires forming a coalition, which tends to be unstable. The Danish series Borgen is great on this - it actually makes the constant cobbling together of a workable governing coalition into a compelling drama. Makes centrism seem not only sanity but charismatic and heroic (although this has a lot to do with the actress playing the leader of the Moderate Party)>
The conflicts between sincerity and irony in SY can conceptualized as Moore (quintessential downtown scenester) vs Ranaldo (unapologetic hippie), with Gordon as the mediator and swing vote (her basic aesthetic foundations and personal connections tied her to Moore, but her feminism made her politically closer to Ranaldo)
DeleteAs far as Albini, he's definitely in the same category as someone like John Waters - someone who baits liberals from a further liberal-left position, and is leery of those wanting to do so from the right (as he put it in a recent Guardian interview, if the biggest assholes you know are saying the same stuff you are, then it's time to change rhetorical course). His 90s engineering credits alone, for such right on names as Nirvana and PJ Harvey, demonstrate where his own beliefs lie
DeleteThis has always fascinated me about Peel - it's SUCH a sudden, brazenly opportunistic shift, and yet for the most part he got away with it to the degree that the 'whispering gardener' persona was treated as an awkward prelude if mentioned at all. I'm sure it helped that he was sincere in his aims, but he seems to have been a true believer who was surprisingly malleable in his beliefs.
ReplyDeleteThis whole area of 'national freeform radio' is odd to me as an American, because here that's a contradiction in terms - 'freeform' is by definition an always-struggling marginal format limited to colleges and some large cities.
This feels a bit ungenerous. Peel was not the first, or the last, to be captivated by a song, a band, a sound, and change his entire worldview as a result. And as Jesus puts it in the King James version: "I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance."
ReplyDeleteThe Quads are indeed awful, though. Oddly reminiscent of the Stone Roses, if they had no chops or style at all. I guess it's the Sixties garage punk influences bubbling up.
I knew about Peel's volte face in 76/77 - but not to this extent.
ReplyDeleteBy the late 90s he playing Roy Harper again on the Radio 1 show. I also heard him introduce Richard and Linda Thompson's 'I wanna see the bright lights tonight' with a spiel along the lines of "In a dark period for rock, this was one of the few records to rally around." So some stuff did get rehabilitated, if rather selectively.
In retrospect, he was lucky that the broadcast and music mag archive was so hard to access in the 80s and 90s - it was quite hard work to show someone up like this. The one person who regularly brought up his hippie past was Gillian Reynolds, the radio critic of the Telegraph, who was a world way from NME land.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete