Showing posts with label BOYS WONDER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BOYS WONDER. Show all posts

Sunday, October 27, 2024

ShitBrit (shite return)

a/k/a the eternal returns of shite

John Harris, in this piece on the Return of Boys Wonder - gigging action at the 100 Club and a new compilation -  advances the thesis that they were BritPop avant la lettre:

"All this might suggest a lost classic from the mid-1990s, and the gaudy wonders of Britpop. But 'Goodbye Jimmy Dean' was actually by Boys Wonder, a visionary band whose star rose and fell between 1986 and 1988. They were about eight years ahead of their time, and in retrospect, their chronically awkward fit with their era was probably always going to be their undoing. But while they lasted, they were great. In 1987, I saw them performing on the Channel 4 comedy show Saturday Live, swaggeringly delivering another three-minute manifesto titled 'Shine on Me' I was smitten, but given their large-scale blanking by the music press (and the fact that the world wide web had yet to be invented), I was left wondering what on earth had happened to them."

Harris singles out as personally epochal the very TV performance that more than any other got me thinking about ShitBrit - I'd be obsessively rewatching this clip, wondering how on earth such obvious bollocks got so far (contrary to Harris, they did get a lot of music paper support)


That Ben Elton intro really adds savor to the shite, don't it!



Farce returns as history

"Some of their original stage outfits feature in Outlaws, a new exhibition centred on “fashion renegades of 80s London” at the capital’s Fashion and Textile Museum. But the main event is a brilliant new Boys Wonder anthology titled Question Everything, most of which has never been heard before."

The motley composition of the band - singer Ben Addison "and  his twin brother, Scott, were art-school alumni from south-east London, who cut their musical teeth as the drummer and bassist with a quartet called Brigandage (“the Sex Pistols with a female singer,” he says), in the vanguard of a short-lived genre known as Positive Punk....  guitarist Graham Jones, who was about to exit the wreckage of early 1980s pop sensations Haircut 100"  - highlights a thing I am fascinated by: the opportunism of bands. 

Sometimes the band sticks together and keeps it name but hops from style to style, across the unfolding of several pop eras. 

Sometimes the band will rename itself over this same process of changing with the times, adjusting to nomenclative fashions .

And then sometimes the bands keep disintegrating but the players reappear in new agglomerations with discards from other bands that didn't make it. The player will have adjusted their look and their playing style to whatever is happening, in hopes that this will finally propel them to fame. 

So many examples... I remember NME mocking Gary Tibbs in the early '80s with a slideshow of his changing looks in different bands - Vibrators, Roxy Music, Adam and the Ants (and subsequently several more). 

I suppose that fits more the journeyman, working-musician archetype perhaps. 

More telling is the makeovers done by prime movers who keep moving with the times. E.g. 

BritShit Emeritus Gareth Sager - The Pop Group, Rip Rig and Panic, Head. 

Or Bebop Deluxe / Red Noise / Bill Nelson in his synthpop phase.

Or Cafe Society / Tom Robinson Band / Sector 27 / Tom Robinson


Yet more proof here of the persistence and aesthetic flexibility of most musicians, with what came after the fizzle of Boys Wonder:

" By the mid-90s, the Addison twins had formed Corduroy, a quartet signed to the Acid Jazz label who retained a London-centric sense of place, but mixed it up with everything from 60s film soundtracks (their first two albums were largely instrumental) to Steely Dan." 

Their image is very different too:


Yes the chap with the glasses and goatee - and the receding hairline - I believe that is the formerly big-eyebrowed frontchap of Boys Wonder.






                                                The missing stink between James Taylor Quartet and the Propellerheads.

Looking good is fine, is a duty for bands, yes yes... but sometimes you wonder whether the BritShitters didn't overbalance their energy output towards clothes and hair rather than sound:

Ben would be sitting over in the corner with a pad and paper and he’d be drawing outfits. Our girlfriends were going to fashion college, so some of them could create the items of clothing that Ben was drawing.... “We would sit down together and watch the Who do My Generation on [1960’s US TV staple] The Smothers Brothers show,” says Addison. “The [Pistols’] God Save the Queen video. Untold Bowie stuff. Roxy, especially with the shoulder pads and Brian Eno’s feathers. Tom Jones when he was at his most gyratable, as it were. And pre-fat Elvis.

".... A visual breakthrough came with the Addisons’ bowl-contoured haircuts, which defied the 80s’ tyranny of quiffs. “A good friend of ours called Andrew McLaughlin was a rising star within Vidal Sassoon,” says Addison. “He turned up one night at the Greenwich theatre bar, which was one of our favourite hangouts, with this bleached, completely severe fringe, like Henry V. He looked like something out of black and white Doctor Who. I said, ‘Fucking hell, Andrew – that is the bomb. This is what we’re going to do.’” Ben combined his new barnet with eyebrows almost comically thickened with an eye-pencil, and instantly had his signature look."


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Last time the topic of ShitBrit came around, a correspondent asked me to talk candidly in subsequent posts (of which they weren't any, although I'd planned to) about the complicity of the music papers - specifically Melody Maker - in elevating all this shite, things like the New Wave of New Wave. Eyewitness accounts of editorial meetings etc. This is what I replied: 

I don’t know if I remember much about the editorial meetings and how things got to be covered

Most of the ShitBrit, there was either genuine enthusiasm from a writer (failings of taste on the part of journos is as much a generative cause of ShitBrit as it is on the audience level). 

Or the attitude was more ‘there’s a buzz about this band, we need to cover it’.  So someone would be dispatched to do that.  I’m not sure we had any actual Levellers fans, for instance, but they needed to be covered, was the thinking

In terms of scenes, Romo was definitely a manifesto looking for an actual movement of good bands, but it was a great manifesto – just a bit premature. If they’d done it around the time of electroclash they would have had a slightly more plausible set of candidates to do the rhetorical push around – if still not quite substance of the enduring kind.

It was certainly a lot better as a concept / rhetoric that the things NME was coming up with (Fraggle Rock, was that one?).

Kingmaker was given a big push by NME. As was Cud.  

MM was not unguilty in covering this type o’shite but it was not our core. I have no idea what those groups sound like – post-Wonderstuff?

New Wave of New Wave – did we start that? Or NME? Can’t remember but yes unadulterated shite. Wasn’t there a band called Snuff? They were probably solid enough, if boring. But SMASH and These Animal Men – typical Brit all mouth no trouser bizniz. 

Manics eventually worked up sufficient substance to pass muster, but lagged far behind their own rhetoric.  The Manics seem to have been some kind of intellectual / militancy lifeline for people a generation below me, especially those living out in the sticks…    the Manics interviews really were their great contribution, their art form (an extension of what Morrissey did, where it was a big part of his job – to be interviewed, to be a provocateur). With the total innovation of having Richie (and Nicky to lesser extent) as the specialized function of discourse – a division of labor, all the musical graft and stolid craftmanship in the singer and drummer, all the attitude (and book reading) in the other two.  

I think we are secretly fond of all this BritShit - it has that nostalgia power now. I almost regret living outside the UK during the second half of the ‘90s, it would have sharpened the blade of my fury even keener, because one would inevitably end up watching Jools Holland every week for want of nothing to do.... 

Tuesday, December 6, 2022

ShitBrit - a fiesta of fester

[12/9/2022 - updated with added data, images + videos]


"Really awful is more interesting to listen to than pretty good", it says up there at the top -  a blog motto borrowed from Uncle Brian Eno.

Does seem like there's more food for thought from contemplating failed 'n' flawed art / entertainment , whether music or film or TV or fiction. Especially if the shitness can be taken as epistemically indicative, a symptom of some larger formation. 

Mostly, though, there's the amazement factor - how did this come to be? how did its creator ever imagine this was a good thing to do? how could they stand to play this tune night after night in concert? To labor over it protractedly in the recording studio? And how on earth did they persuade the Money People to invest in this until its shitty fruition?  Perhaps most mysterious is the creator's pride, and their confidence - their sheer self-belief and conviction that the world is crying out for this shit and will clasp it to its collective bosom! 

There is definitely a corruption of sensibility that sets in when you've been in this music-listening / music-evaluating / music-thinking game for an exceedingly long time...  It gets to the point where the pungency of shite is more stimulating than all but the most supremely splendid. 

And so I present: ShitBrit. 

Mostly this is an exercise in pointing at things and going "Why?!?" Occasionally a thought will be ventured.

Attentive readers of this drivel-blog will notice that this episode is to some degree a return to that sporadically picked flaky scab o' mine known as the Bad Music Era... But there has been some mission creep, or Era Sprawl, so the trawl sweeps beyond the 85-86 Nadir and into the '90s... The later examples are very much spiritually of a piece with the BME stuff -  and the connective is nationality, of course. 

Partly it's a structural thing, to do with the UK nexus of weekly music papers, publicists, radio pluggers and radio producers, people who book bands for television shows.  Really truly shaky musical propositions can get surprisingly far - onto music paper covers, TV youth programs, record deals, and even into the charts.  There is also the native tradition of the novelty single. 

But there's something more... Every country in the world has its musical shit - schlager, or some phoney local version of a Anglo / American trend or scene. But there is something unique about Britshit. America's shite has a totally different texture and tang. Something quintessentially British, or even English, animates this aural offal.  So in a funny way, there's a curious inverted patriotism lurking here too: only my homeland produces this precise type of crap. 

Nominations for future installments most welcome - as are ShitBrittier examples of tunes / videos by the groups below. 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Boys Wonder 



Evidence in support of the "really awful > pretty good" proposition, insofar as I've watched this clip many more times in the last decade than any group from the same timeframe that I adore and revere. 

The Ben Elton introduction really adds to the inglorious ShitBritness. 




Ahead of their own time in one element only - the hyper-accentuated eyebrows seem totally 2010s


"We had Beatles / We had Pistols / And now you won't get out of bed 

"Take my hand / Buy this band / We're going to do it again

































^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Gaye Bykers on Acid

 


Grebo in general is a rich seam o' ShitBrit. I have had the misfortune of seeing Gaye Bykers live. And they were probably the stand-out entertainment in that whole bunch. 



MM shoulders some of the blame (although Arsequake League was solidly opposed - on the grounds that grebo quaked no arses)























Did they all hail from the Midlands? The word Stourbridge springs to mind unbidden.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sleeper




Now there’s loads of mediocre music in the world...  and then there’s the vast mundane plain of the well-made middlebrow. To properly qualify as Shitbrit, there needs to be an extra level of imposture and fecklessness - a “getting away with it” element. The group relies on attitude and front to compensate for the fact they can’t be arsed to work up a basic level of competence. 

So for instance you might hate Fatboy Slim -  or in a different area, Housemartins. But there is a basic level of competence in execution that is undeniable. The product, misconceived or appalling for other reasons, does its self-designated job.  Most Madchester, the bulk of Britpop - it is lame or unimaginative, gauche or plain naff, but a base-level solidity passes muster. The failings of The High or the Mock Turtles or Cast are on the level of conception rather than execution.  

Sleeper, though  - the ShitBritness is flagrant, writ large in the writing itself  (the ungainly structure, the bandy-legged rhythm, the ill-hewn lyric) and the performance (the lion's share of infamy here going to Wener for her singing  - there is no voice as such - and "dancing"). 





















MM - a hit with the Shit Girl

















creepy-creepy interview from ginger nut


eeuw, even creepier start to this interview from one Ralf Little







^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Fabulous


Managed by a music journo James Brown (then features editor at NME but soon to start Loaded) and fronted by another NME journo with alleged sex appeal. Not promising, eh? 

I remember a Fabulous feature in which they were playing a gig in the provinces and Brown explained to the reporter that he never booked a hotel for the band in such circumstances - "if they don't have the nous and the gumption to cop off with someone after the show, they don't deserve to be in Fabulous".
















A comp of Fabulous recordings released this very year would you Adam and Eve it? 















Girls driven crazy by Simon Dudfield's crotch, we are supposed to believe 

They tried the same sales pitch at the time


















1991 - so a little bit too far in front of the coming Shitegeist that was the New Wave of New Wave























^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Flowered Up




London Records signed Flowered Up for a quarter million pounds, a six-album deal! 


























Extra Britshit factor here thanks to Keith Allen's intro - and headgarment.




London's answer to Happy Mondays - but who was asking the question? Inspiration dried up with the name of the group, which is good - "Flowered Up" symbolizing proletarian life-force squeezing itself up like weeds in a cracked inner-city paving stone, I think was the gist of it.  


Admittedly Flowered Up do have a semi-redeeming moment - "Weekender". It's almost-great. But I suspect that the group may not be doing much playing on the record - the epic-ness of the sound, never so much gestured at on the earlier F-Up records, gives off a whiff of Frankie Goes To Hollywood on "Relax" and "Two Tribes". And a lot of the almost-greatness is down to the video - really a short film about the ups and downs of the raving lifestyle, full of echoes of mod and "Friday On My Mind", and actual samples from Quadrophrenia etc. 





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Moonflowers



Bristol's answer to Flowered Up - and nobody was asking that question. 


























A group evacuated utterly from my memory until I saw their name not so long ago courtesy of Nothingelseon.  The New Zealander scans old issues of Melody Maker and NME from the '80s / '90s and shares them on Twitter, God bless him (he's now up to early '92).  His efforts churn up an embarrassment of Britshit riches that will doubtless ensure future installments of this blog series.

(Would you Adam and Eve it - Moonflowers have apparently released 8 EPs and 7 EPs!)
















^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Head




A car crash of signifiers I can't stop gawping at. 

Amazingly, this is a group formed by Gareth Sager formerly of The Pop Group!
















the debut Head LP - A Snog on the Rocks

A track from their major label debut Tales of Ordinary Madness - "1000 Hangovers Later"


The singer Bertie really fancied himself - the group's repertoire includes a cover of "Me and Mrs Jones"

They carried on the hard boozing theme - and the erroneotion that the singer was a sex symbol - with another album for Virgin 














In between PG and Head, Gareth had led this other, wildly different outfit, whose haplessness would almost qualify for ShitBrititude, but they have better intentions and sources - arguably better outcomes, although personally I've never managed to make it through either God or I Am Cold



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sheep on Drugs




I don't know if this group were really "shit" - the music is solid enough -  but there's a kind of effrontery here that puts them on the edge of the zone. A lot of attitude and posture - the image, the name itself  (those "sheep on drugs", the raving massive, made the most avant sounds of the '90s, way more strange 'n'  deranged than what you lot came up with). Alien Sex Fiend after hearing a couple of Kickin' compilations.


Loadsa attitude, calling your debut album Greatest Hits. Trouble was, none of them were. 




























Plain janes, or plain johns, making themselves "interesting" with make-up and grimaces, in the Alice Cooper / Marilyn Manson tradition.  









































^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The Farm


I don't mind this - rather like the rippling guitar lick - but there is something so stocky and stolid about the lumbering groove. Song-wise, it's just a phoned-in Xerox of freakbeat mod, a studio reject by The Eyes or The Sorrows,  strapped to the chassis of a baggy canter, and the lyric makes no sense - one minute he's berating her for losing her youthful rebelliousness, the next exalting her as "so special".  


What a weedy vocal. 


















^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Robyn Hitchcock 


After catching this on Old Grey Whistle Test at the time, I have never been able to take Mr Hitchcock seriously. 

Intro from Mark Ellen boosts the ShitBrit Factor








Strangely I love Martin Newell's stuff. 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Garage rock (The Prisoners, Thee Milkshakes, etc)




A recreation that comes out wrong - the lust for the lost "real" producing a false and forced energy. 

With the first group, you can hear that before they went "garage", they were probably a mod revival band. 

BritShit factor always intensified three-fold when framed by Jools Holland. 























^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Blaggers ITA



I mentioned the structural factor (weekly music papers, TV bookers, etc) causing this churn that requires new stuff, not-ready stuff, shaky propositions...  But you can only blame the system so much - a lot of the fault lies with the audience, what they are prepared to put up with. There is something about the British tolerance for deficiency that is unique (I wonder if it goes back to the rationing era - and how for decades after rationing was over, "ice cream" in the UK was basically made of vegetable fat, it was margarine with a lot of sugar and flavorings. Or the kind of muck they serve for school dinners, all those ghastly desserts like spotted dick, milk pudding, blancmange). 

Carducci talks about a kind of listening where you sense the group's intention and supply it aurally even when it's not achieved or barely even gestured at. He was talking specifically about how after punk and its ethos of deskilling, you had a lot of rhythmically substandard outfits who got very successful - how British rock in the '60s and '70s had been all about great drummers and rhythms sections but after punk you could prosper as a band with barely adequate drumming, feeble rhythms etc. That only got worse with indie and Britpop.

There's a kind of solidarity-based listening where you like the attitude or line of patter that the group puts out - support their values or reckon they are good people - and as a result are prepared to turn a blind ear to the manifest failings in sonic execution. You imaginatively project the kind of musical substance that they ought to have and would supply if capable of it, or if prepared to go to the bother of learning how to deliver it.

Blaggers ITA were one of those "hearts in the right place" bands. Music as delivery system for messages.  Reformed Oi! roots, workerist politics. Affiliated with Anti-Fascist Action. Bit like a '90s Ruts (but without the muscle) or a  less party-line Redskins (with more modern references points when it came to black music.). 









"underpants are naff" (nuddy not-so-slight unsightly return)

  "Latrine lunacy"! In the same 1980 issue of Sounds , wholly gratuitous shot of depantsed but thankfully still underpanted Judge ...